Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Penerima Protokol Notaris yang Meninggal Dunia

Eko Permana Putra(1*), Yuliandri Yuliandri(2), Azmi Fendri(3)
(1) Universitas Riau
(2) Universitas Andalas
(3) Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2608

Abstract

answer the needs and interests of the community of legal certainty, as stated in the agreements, agreements and agreements made by the parties in the form of authentic deeds. The making of an authentic deed as a perfect proof and no further evidence is needed to strengthen the arguments in a legal case. Authentic deed consists of minuta deed and a copy of the deed. Minutes of deed are kept by a Notary who is part of the Notary protocol which must be kept and maintained by the notary because it is a state archive. Article 1 number 8 of the UUJN states that "Authentic Deed that is kept as a notary protocol is minuta deed, that is, the original deed which includes the signatures of the registrants, witnesses, and Notary that are kept as part of the notary protocol. Notary recipient of other notary protocols obliged to save this deed is not responsible for the contents of the deed of the notary protocol that it receives. The notary is obliged directly to the Notary protocol. The death of a Notary Public, in addition to leaving problems regarding work pending, of course, will also leave other problems related to the Notary protocol. Notary recipient of the Notary protocol is not the deed maker of the Notary protocol submitted to him. The notary recipient of the protocol can provide services to the client or the public by issuing a grosse deed, a copy of the deed and a citation of the deed of minuta deed which is part of the Notary protocol that has been submitted to him.

Keywords


The Freedom in Delivering Opinions, Treason, Aanslag

References


Adjie, Habib, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.

_________, Hukum Notaris Di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2009.

Darsono, Prawironegoro, Filsafat Ilmu Pendidikan, Jakarta: Nusantara Consulting, 2010.

Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Jayanat, Ratih Tri, “Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Akta Yang Dibuatnya Manakala Ada Sengketa Di Pengadilan Negeri (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak No. 72/Pdtg/Pn.Pontianak)”, Tesis, Semarang: Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.

Kie, Tan Thong, Studi Notariat – Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2000.

Mahisaajy, mahisaajy.blogspot.co.id/2011/03/jenis-jenis-tanggung-jawab.html, diakses pada 24 Desember 2018, Pukul 16.30 WIB.

Soegianto, “Tanggung Jawab Pendiri dan Notaris dalam Kaitannya dengan Penyetoran Modal untuk Pembuatan Akta Pendirian Perseroan”, Tesis, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2003.

Soekanto, Soerjono & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali, 1985.

Waluyo, Bambang, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 14 times
PDF views : 11 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 ALHURRIYAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.