Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Dengan Adanya Klausul Eksonerasi Dalam Perjanjian Baku Sewa Guna Usaha (Leasing)

Alfikhi Abdul Rahman(1*)
(1) Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.3000

Abstract

The problems examined in this paper are: How is the material content of the exoneration clause in the lease standard agreement that causes losses for consumers of PT. Dipo Star Finance branch of Padang and how the judges consider in deciding the principal case of leasing based on Decision Number 4/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Pdg. In this study, the method used is normative juridical which is descriptive where the datas are sourced from primary and secondary data obtained based on the study of documents analyzed qualitatively. From this research, it can be concluded that at the time of making the finance lease agreement there is a will of disability regarding article 29 of the lease agreement and is an exoneration clause that is very detrimental to the consumer. Lesse does not know that collateral for other agreements is a guarantee of the object of the agreement that has paid off. Based on the judgment of the judge and the statement from the witness of the agreement law, article 29 of the lease agreement binds both parties based on the principle of pacta sunt servanda, but no statement or word is found which confirms that the guarantee for the agreement that has ended is a guarantee against other agreements, so that the guarantee becomes multi-interpretation. Article provisions relating to agreement one with other agreements in the agreement is very detrimental to consumers and contrary to article 10 letter (c) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.

Keywords


Business Lease, Exoneration Clause, Standard Agreement

References


Abdulkadir Muhammad dan Rilda Murniati, 2000, Segi Hukum Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Achmad Ali, 2009, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence), Kencana, Jakarta.

Ahmadi Miru dan Sutarman Yodo, 2008, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin, 2010, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Herlien Budiono, 2010, Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan, Citra Aditya, Bandung.

Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 1169 Tahun 1991 tentang Kegiatan Sewa Guna Usaha.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 2008, Aneka Hukum Bisnis, Alumni, Bandung.

Maxmanroe.com, Pengertian Modal Secara Umum, Manfaat, Sumber, dan Jenis-Jenis Modal, https://www.maxmanroe.com/vid/bisnis/pengertian-modal.html, Terakhir diakses tanggal 2 Desember 2018.

Munir Fuady, 2003, Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis), Buku Kedua, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Lembaga Pembiayaan

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 2001, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Salim H.S, 2015, Hukum Kontrak, Perjanjian, Pinjaman dan Hibah, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta.

Sunaryo, 2009, Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Syarif Mappiasse, 2015, Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim, Kencana, Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 13 times
PDF views : 7 times

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 ALHURRIYAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.